A place for a

25.11.2015

I am such a fucking outsider

I am such a fucking outsider, that even the outsiders do not want me. Here I am, laughing at society and its stupidity. Then I turn around and laugh even harder at those who expect anything else from it. I am everybody’s reject.

I despise a woman’s vapidity, but I am equally bored by those who listen to nothing but reason.

I am appalled by Christianity, yet I find Satanists even more ridiculous. Think of it, Christianity invented Satan in the first place.

I like to break rules, morals and laws, yet I do not want to live in a world without any.

I wish to belong, yet I do not want to submit to any set of ideas and obligations.

I enjoy the mechanics of positive thinking, yet I fantasize about the possibilities to abuse them for evil purposes, whatever that means.

Despite my respect for the usefulness of positive emotions, I appreciate negative emotions for the exciting and extreme experiences they are.

I like motivating mindsets, but I reject that they have anything to do with reality.

I enjoy harmony, yet I am disgusted by the notion of forcing it.

I like rationality, yet I ridicule those who think that it can exist independently of emotions.

I like to do evil things, yet I do not want to define myself through that. I enjoy glory and reason as much as depravity, pleasure and pain.

I like spirituality, but I laugh at Jesus-like little narcissists. I believe in some kind of the divine, but I do not think that it prescribes any rules for living.

I like to dwell in reality and be materialistic, but I despise doctrines like Objectivism who can not think past that.

I am a selfish asshole, but it just means that I do what I want. If it means abusing someone, fine. If it means helping somebody, also good. I laugh at those who derive a self-restricting life philosophy from either selfishness or altruism, which from that point they have to adhere to.

I sometimes feel the need to kill everybody and myself, but those who actually do it amuse me.

I can empathize with weakness, but I often choose not to.

I can admire greatness, but I often choose to feel the wish to beat it instead.

If I was black, I would not automatically be a part of the black movement. If I was gay, I would not automatically start walking around with feminine gestures, cut my dick off and take female hormones. I hate being one of something as much as I desire it.

I want to have sex and do something for it, but I want to have my individual edge and occasionally tell the bitches to fuck themselves for no other reason than them stepping on a sensitivity of mine.

I want to be dominant and masculine, but I do not care for people calling me that. I want to be a man, but I do not want anybody to tell me what that means.

I want someone to guide me, but there is no one perfect enough to have all the answers I want. So I guess I have to walk it on my own.

I want to be a German without having to sing the hymn. I want to be a man without having to despise women. I want to despise women without having to justify it.

All in all, I like to take what I want out of everything without becoming a follower of doctrines. And I like to fight people occasionally, without making them my sworn enemies. I like to oppose, but I do not like to define myself through my opposition. I like to agree, but I hate expectations of loyalty.

I like to take a part of the cake without becoming a part of the package.

I am a fucking outsider. Because no group wants me. But I guess I am lying. I am a fucking outsider because I do not want to adapt to any singular group. Because anyone whose identity is to be found in fellowship, must be a simpleton in my eyes.

I am a fucking outsider. I believe in so little that I do not even believe in questioning everything.

I am a fucking outsider. I do not believe in mothers, in fathers; in men, in pussies; in manginas, in girls; in the state, in god; in patriarchy, in feminism; in capitalism, in socialism; in civilization, in tribal life; in protest, in obedience; in honesty, in manipulation; in morals, in amorality; in politeness, in status; in martyrs, in heroes; in winners, in losers; in goodness, in evil; in empaths, in psychopaths; in principles, in integrity; in love, in hatred; in absolutes, in relativity; in intelligence, in stupidity; in rules or in freedom.

I am a fucking outsider, because it is all a joke to me.

2 votes
  • Micah Geni

    hehe.. Think you touched most dimensions.. Fun and thoughtprovoking

  • thordaddy

    Radical autonomy is what you desire.

  • thordaddy

    Total self-annihilation is “what” you shall get in return…

    And as long as you can psychologically reconcile with this unassailable equation then you can at least lurch conceptually closer to a settled mind.

    • Stop putting me in that box. I love my life. And still do not want to be a follower.

      • thordaddy

        Lol… All that pontification and your radical autonomy turns into a “box?”

        • I mean self-annihilation. That is your fantasy of my future, not necessarily reality.

          • thordaddy

            Fantasy? As in empirical imagination? Don’t you “see” how such an admission makes you mad, ie., crazy… Er… AT WAR with all of reality down to smallest matter… The nanoaggression… This is where radical autonomy must take you… The closer one gets to the elusive Land of Absolute Freedom (LAF), the deeper into the rabbit hole one must dig to get there.

          • You assume that the rabbit hole annihilates you. It does not. It sets you free. Is that not what you wish for yourself?

          • thordaddy

            I assume there is no “bottom” to the rabbit hole and one physically, ie., per the laws of physics, annihilates his Self attempting to “reach” that bottom. BUT KNOWING THIS IN ADVANCE, one can say he in fact DESIRES self-annihilation and the bottomless rabbit hole merely pretext easily digested by a stupefied mass.

      • thordaddy

        Radical autonomy is the attempt at escaping one’s self-imposed “box” and the logical futility of such endeavor.

        • Interesting.

          • thordaddy

            You are a high IQ “white” male who was deeply immersed in your own unique “box” of radical autonomy. A no “rhyme or reason” sort of cultivation… A subtle nod to a mother’s perception of total chaos and its psychological consequences. You NOW seek “rhyme and reason” although you are still unclear as to whether you will derive meaning from anything found. But this is ALSO PRE-CHOSEN. Because you really don’t seek any rhyme or reason and now you are just pissed for getting exactly from your mother that you desired all along… No “box” called “rhyme or reason” will I be encased.

          • Rhyme or reason? I am not following.

          • thordaddy

            Are you not trying to figure out EXACTLY “what” you are doing here?

          • I am tired of these debates. I hardly ever understand what you are saying. Sorry. Work on your wording or something.

          • thordaddy

            Lol… Impossible. You want to act in such a manner as to be unexplainable. Well, that’s the explanation.

          • thordaddy

            “I’m tired of these debates.”

            Really try to wrap your head around THE SHEER FALSENESS of this CLAIM of YOURS???

            There is neither a debate… You attempt to act INEXPLICABLY and my SUCH IS my explanation AND SO there is TOTAL AGREEMENT… The antithesis of “debate.” So when you realize that you are in fact “tired” of total agreement then that absurdity exposes itself. So you are laying falsehood upon falsehood. No debate and no exhaustion from total agreement.

            You want to be RADICALLY AUTONOMOUS… Unexplainable to the outside world AND THIS is the final explanation for those that can really pull it off and still breathe.

          • What?

          • thordaddy

            You want all external view of Tom Arrow to be inarticulated… In other words, you want to deny all the ability to explain Tom Arrow to others. You want to be radically autonomous.

          • thordaddy

            You want to be unexplainable… You want to “transcend” the empirical paradigm.

          • Ah. No, that is not the problem. There are 2 problems:

            1. I do not fully understand myself, although I am working on it.

            2. I do not understand what the fuck you write.

          • thordaddy

            1. Exactly… There is still inherent desire to explain the unexplainable in one’s self. This is a good sign, but may only be you “showing face.”

            2. This is a defense mechanism of last resort. Simply claiming incomprehensibility. But “we” have implicitly establised that we both agree to explain the unexplainable in Tom Arrow.

            So I am trying to explain you to you WHEN you are crossing back and forth from your self-imposed strictly empirical paradigm to your fantasy world of death.

          • So you are saying that I imposed on myself the need to be explainable and want to transcend it by denying every explanation until I cease to do anything that would make sense?

          • thordaddy

            What I am saying is that there is an inherent desire for intelligence to be understood and that in your desire for radical autonomy… You DESIRE to not ultimately be understood, ie., be put in a “box,” YOU HAVE SEEMINGLY FORGOTTEN that you operate in a strictly empirical paradigm (self-imposed… You don’t have to operate in a strictly material paradigm) to which your total explanation MUST BE AT HAND.

          • Strictly material? What do you mean? Are you referring to my ‘What if your body is your soul?’ article?

          • thordaddy

            I am speaking of when you elevate the scientific method as your highest operating mechanism. To be both unexplainable and efficient is the stuff of radical autonomy.

          • You are right, the scientific method is not the best thing for personal living. As someone I like to read said, life is an experience to make, not a problem to solve.

            Wait.

            Ah!

            You are saying that I should not try to express myself through numbers and quantifiable measures. To not see myself as a collection of scientific traits and instead as a unique soul. Correct?

          • I thought about it. You are right. I want to be unexplainable. It is dangerous to be explainable. If someone can predict me, they can abuse me. So each time I feel someone understands my intentions, I instinctively calculate a way to act in a way that he or she would never expect. That makes me unpredictable and safe from manipulation. It also makes my life a living hell. Yes, it actually has tendencies of self-annihilation. Since whenever somebody is able to observe my self, I must consciously reject and circumvent it. This means that if someone was to perfectly understand me, I would need to completely stop existing to be safe.

          • thordaddy

            So now, in our Profiling State — Police State + Nanny state — being “unexplainable” is the PREDICTED hypothesis. So massive data collection and analysis is required to “predict” radical autonomy on the mass scale.

          • What do you mean?

          • thordaddy

            You are not a real outsider UNLESS you are a genuine white Supremacist. You are of a mass of “unexplainables.” Your key distinction being high IQ modern “white” male… Er, the ONLY POSSIBLE candidate for genuine white Supremacy. You are a target for annihilation DUE the brute fact of your existence AT THIS VERY JUNCTURE in time.

          • You distinguish between self-annihilation and annihilation, I suppose? So I can choose between being a ‘white supremacist’ and becoming a target of annihilation or to self-annihilate from free will?

            Why do I need to be a white supremacist when I can just be myself? You said yourself that each person is unique and I believe that to be true. Each soul has a unique signature. Why try to be anything?

          • thordaddy

            I make distinction between annihilation and self-annihilation which then has nothing to do with the phenomena operating concurrently in a symbiotic regression…

            Your acts of self-annihilation BEGET desire to annihilate you in others…

            And your subconscious belief in Hell… Total annihilation… GENUINE radical autonomy… “Conscious” oblivion… BEGETS acts of self-annihilation.

            Genuine white Supremacy IS THE ONLY WAY OUT of the absolute descent…

            Man doesn’t float…

            He strives towards Supremacy…

            Or his IS IN descent!

            If you can articulate your way out of such a psychological “box,” FEEL FREE.

          • So your proposition is what?

          • thordaddy

            I’m only presenting to you what I believe are the very real options of the high IQ modern “white” male…

            All out radical autonomy…

            Or genuine white Supremacy.

            And I can leave most of the details exactly where they belong which shall be in your bubbling cauldron of a mind.

          • Bubbling cauldron? Watch your mouth.

          • thordaddy

            Interestingly enough, another “side effect” of authoritarian mother’s hood…

          • Your mouth?

          • thordaddy

            Lol… No… YOUR desire to control others’ mouths…

            “Watch* your mouth!”

            * I understand it was said in jest… Or, that was my interpretation… But, I must take all evidence into consideration and ponder residual effects manifested.

          • I was half serious. The phrasing was a joke, but I really was a little offended.

          • thordaddy

            Offended by a “bubbling cauldron” of a mind?

            Could you provide a more apt metaphor?

            Or I declare your “offense” as little more than maximizing your autonomy at my expense.

          • An overperforming supercomputer.

          • thordaddy

            Lol… But even that “overperforming supercomputer” will take the FORM of “bubbling cauldron” per BOTH overperformance AND advanced “mechanics.”

          • Nah. I am pure awesomeness. Nothing bubbly here.

          • thordaddy

            I was thinking more along the line of the latest Terminator model.

          • Haha. So ‘bubbling cauldron’ is a compliment or what?

          • thordaddy

            Mind as “bubbling cauldron” is a straight and morally value free analysis…

            Your mind is hot and energetic with an overabundance of thoughts…

            BUT WHO turns the thermostat up or down in your case…

            And why is all the “action” aimed at self-annihilation versus Perfection? Are not the avenues to both EQUALLY EXPANSIVE and able to induce the mind to an absolutely frenzied state?

          • Maybe.

          • thordaddy

            A “maybe” in the empirical realm is a “yes” IF desired.

          • What does ’empirical’ mean to you?

          • thordaddy

            Empirical are all “things” sensed.

          • Ah, okay.

          • thordaddy

            Just as you have not put much thought into genuine white Supremacy, you have also given very little thought to being an anti-white Supremacist… Very little thought of being against the perfection of white man… And because you have self-imposed a limitation on your own personal perfecting, you very subconsciously seek to impose this anti-white Supremacist ethos outwards as a “defense mechanism” effectually maximize your personal space. You, as anti-white Supremacist, create a Dark Aura to repel your “betters.” This is though, a battle INHERENT TO ALL high IQ “white” males, who by nature and man-made structure, are wont to believe in their superior civilizational skill set.

            They have [NOT] delivered…

            Because they are STILL FUNDAMENTALLY anti-white Supremacists as a general class and as particular individuals.

            You are VOLUNTARILY CONFINED to this AwS “box” via a self-imposed psychological limitation.

          • What is that limitation?

          • thordaddy

            That Tom Arrow cannot be bedazzled by Perfection in the manner in which Chaos transfixes him.

          • Chaos seems real. It reflects my empirical experience. Perfection is hopefully that which I will experience when the chaos is resolved. I am getting closer to that. Although I do not guarantee that my idea of perfection is the same as yours. My idea is of it is: An unrestrained and unconflicted free will (by my definition), so that intent and action become one.

          • thordaddy

            Chaos is real… But indescribable when not “painted” upon The Canvas of Perfection.

            The universal order is not towards degradation AS FAR AS THE MIND AND SPIRIT GO…

            And those that tend to PHYSICAL ENTROPY are SELF-disqualified from position of leadership.

            To BELIEVE one can articulate CHAOS without first granting Perfection is THE SIGNAL that one is dealing with a radical autonomist… One is dealing with another WHO ONLY OPERATES in terms of maximizing and minimizing the radical autonomy within his Dark Aura. So in the zero-sum paradigm of a FINITE playing field, ie., strictly material, one can maximize his autonomy, minimize another’s autonomy and any percent combination in between. A bottomless “rabbit hole” allows one to take his “fight for freedom” down to the nanoaggression.

          • Hm. Not sure I understand fully.

            You know what. On my Ayahuasca ceremony, I had this idea that chaos is the default. And that god comes into chaos and provides structure.

          • thordaddy

            It does not “make sense” for “chaos to be the default” IF YOU HAVE ALREADY confined one’s self to a finite playing field. In other words, what is a totally chaotic world without a transcendent realm OTHER THAN JUST reality? Meaning, JUST SAYING, “Reality is Chaos,” TELLS US EXACTLY NOTHING about reality.

          • thordaddy

            Chaos is YOUR BATTLE with Perfection.

          • thordaddy

            What is the modern conceit?

            Trying to “perfect man” without actually believing in The Perfect Man, ie., Perfection in the empirical sense.

          • thordaddy

            Empirical means all “things” sensed

            PS Some responses are disappearing like the above which I have submitted again.

          • PS No need, it is probably a problem with your internet connection. I see it all.

          • thordaddy

            Word.

          • thordaddy

            Does it not seem plausible for the mind to be as equally “scrambled” in confronting Perfection as it is in confronting Chaos?

          • Your acts of self-annihilation BEGET desire to annihilate you in others…

            That means: You read my stuff and wish to annihilate me. Correct?

          • thordaddy

            No… I wish to convert you to white Supremacy… You are not a conscious “preacher” of self-annihilation and so you have not provoked a justifiable annihilation in return.

          • Logically, the only real preacher would have to be one who does not believe in what he preaches and is out to control and enslave. Correct?

          • thordaddy

            That’s very much seems to be the protocol… The liberal application of nondiscrimination and tolerance (all-accepting indiscriminancy) is for thee and not for me…

          • If I had interest in conversion, what would that require of me?

          • thordaddy

            A total reframe…

            One that starts with the First Law of Liberation…

            Supremacy = degeneracy

            TOTALLY REJECTS THE SELF-evident falsehood of this equation…

            Then ponders the First Law of Perfection… Nonduplication as the ONLY solution to “infinite regress…”

            Goes “game theory” and logically concludes that executing “all the right moves” is the surest path to victory…

            And then recognize that the genuine white Supremacist is, by definition and absolute conception, that title of a great white man wholeheartedly set against the liberal zeitgeist.

          • I think I am closer to embracing the first thing at least. Although it has to be said, with my newest insight, that even the greatest degeneracy is motivated by supreme intents. Or at least understandable.

            What is infinite regress?

            The last part I will likely never embrace, because I believe it to be ideology. I do not care about the zeitgeist nor do I care to fight it. I just care to live a blast of a life, in the most positive and supreme sense – in my interpretation, anyway.

          • thordaddy

            Who cares if you embrace it… The zeitgeist WILL FORCE IT UPON YOU…

            Or…

            You SIMPLY MAKE NICE with radical autonomy and INEVITABLE self-annihilation.

            Only in DEATH and with total rejection of Perfection can one obtain genuine radical autonomy. In the empirical world, you are LIMITED by the physical reality of your existence and thus your ventures into radical autonomy are never completed and ACTUALLY represent a process of purposeful degradation.

            Since this is the zeitgeist… This is the “mechanism” by which one establishes a “default elite” then you are, as one who rejects genuine white Supremacy, NOW A VOLUNTARY ADVOCATE OF ZEITGEIST.

          • Hm.

          • thordaddy

            If one wants to “win” without getting blood on his hands, he “preaches” self-annihilation with a radically liberated language… Er, he calls this self-annihilation “freedom” and “sacrifice,” for instance.

          • thordaddy

            The “infinite regress” is that way back to Nothing from whence “sprung” something and just to give “us” Tom Arrow. Of course, this mandates a “descent with modification” AND THUS A PHYSICAL REMNANT CARRIED ALL THE WAY THROUGH from BEGINNING TO ENDING…

            This “thing” duplicates… Over and over again FROM THEN until NOW…

            The “solution” to this “backwards duplication,” ie., infinite regress, is NONDUPLICATION…

            There is only ONE THING that cannot be totally physically duplicated. Perfection.

            “We” are speaking metaphysical assumptions and how modern high IQ “white” male HOLDS BOTH IN HIS HEAD and MAKES MADNESS attempting to reconcile the schism.

          • Fuck. You are right about the scientific thing. I think I am starting to understand.

            You can quantify and explain fire in a textbook. You can explain how it burns your skin when you touch it. But all that knowledge does in no way add up or replace the experience of seeing and feeling fire interact with the world and yourself. You can analyze it, but not resynthesize it. You can quantify and predict its appearance, but you can only feel its character.

            And often we – and I – use science to ‘explain away’ things. We say about love that ‘it is just hormones’. And forget that the knowledge of this physical manifestation does in no way ‘explain’ the experience of love for the soul.

            But in reality, this quantification is irrelevant unless predictions are to be made. Is that what you are trying to say?

          • thordaddy

            I am saying that if one lives by a strictly empirical world one must die in a strictly empirical way… And his desire to find meaning in death vanquished.

          • What do you mean by ’empirical’?

          • thordaddy

            The feedback loop is then recognizing patterns of self-annihilation and then carefully media dosing the masses on one’s way to a “default elite” status…

            To which Tom Arrow climbs ever father into the rabbit hole of unexplainability.

          • thordaddy

            And you WILL self-annihilate in attempting to “transcend” this empirical paradigm BECAUSE it is apparently a self-imposed limitation one has duly forgotten HE SELF IMPOSED.

          • I do have an emotional reaction to this sentence. But I do not quite understand what it means.

          • thordaddy

            So the harder I try to empirically explain Tom Arrow, the more he must engage in acts of self-annihilation, ie., disassociating his self from the empirical world… Otherwise, understood as seeking “death.”

          • Ah, now I get where you are going. There is some truth in it, but I am not sure where to put it in the puzzle.

  • Smokingjacket

    What’s your idea of self autonomous perfection. Where will it lead you? If you reject them all- what’s left? That’s the question you have to ask.

    • I am left. Well no, I am not left. I just am. It is not like I take all those things away from what I am. It is that I refuse to restrain myself to any of those boxes – which, naturally, also were put into existence by other original thinkers. So if the original thinkers were free to create arbitrary boxes, why should I not do the same instead of stepping in one of them?

      • Smokingjacket

        You’ll never be totally outside the box even we you think you are- the only “true outside the box” strictly speaking is madness and death. Not an ideal combination. The very best the few “outsiders” can do is to make their box larger and more encompassing.

        You may refuse to to be restrained by others- but every single thought that you’ve ever had is the result of learning it from other people- it’s delusional to imagine you can exist in a coherent state of being, by being beyond the ambit of society. Even an old time hunter in Alaska who lives off the land comes into town ever couple of weeks and also trades his skins and furs when in the wilds with the intuits for tobacco and whiskey. I think your definition of autonomy is crazy. There’s only relative degrees of freedom in life and the man who doesn’t run and hide from his fellow man is freer than the one who does.

        • You misunderstand me. Your interpretation of my words is that I am trying hard to not have anything in common with any of the boxes. I never wrote that. I wrote that I do not identify with any particular box. I just take whatever I want out of any.

          Yeah, of course a big part of my thoughts is from others. But not all. That is illogical and would imply that original thought does not exist. Which begs the question where the first people got their thoughts from.

          • Smokingjacket

            “Which begs the question where the first people got their thoughts from” The leap from animal awareness to human self awareness and consciousness in our collective past defies any starting point. It shouldn’t have happened based upon our current understanding of the laws of nature, perhaps, there the hand of the gods, not God, played a part?

  • Ben Dover

    Are you me? I think so similarly to yourself. I say fuck society and conformity, yet a part of me wants to belong, to fit in.

    • Imam most certainly not your self. Much too busy being my self. I agree, fuck that nebulous phamtom called society.

  • Deanie Dean

    Hey man isn’t this type of thinking so dissatisfying though?

    I think i would be more fulfilled if i just live for myself and invite people along to my life for those memories. If it messes up then at least i had the good times.

    Think about your childhood friends. Even if messes up afterwards , they make for rewarding memories though right?

    • Oh, I don’t know. I am not even sure I think this stuff all the time. It’s more of an observation.

      What you say about living for yourself is basically what I mean. And how better to live on your own terms than by rejecting some preset categorizations of reality into all kinds of stuff?

      • Deanie Dean

        Yes we all know the new millenial agenda is a load of rubbish, i feel like you should push your message out more though. Negativity will never end , it’s the nature of itself, but your vision needs to come out mate!

        • I am not sure I have a particular vision. I just churn out the stuff that comes to my head.

          • Deanie Dean

            Have you thought about creating one for this website atleast. Multiple things i envision:

            *Website to bring single mother household guys together.
            *Website that talk about single mother issues and provides a forum of REAL education and experience on this matter.
            *Website that shows the pathways that can bring guys out of the shitty single mother household situation and ways to develop outside of maternal influence.
            *Seminars and meetups for like-minded guys and to provide a basis for educating the masses and help guys fix those types of issues.
            *E-books on how to become a strong man despite lack of paternal influences.

            And these were just from the top of my head. You can go big with these points and become an “authority” on this subject. And it is a huge subject affecting millions all over the world.

            Let me know what you think! :D

          • Good ideas, but I would not go as far as to do that before I am at peace with who I am fully and have actually developed into a confident man. Before that, I don’t feel there is any point in me ‘teaching’ anyone how to do it.

            First I need the answers. Actually, first I need the real questions. When I have all that, I can start churning it out. As for now, I’ll just keep throwing my thoughts out there, trusting they will find the right people who need to read them. Even if its just a handful of guys. Law of attraction.

            Thing is, I am also starting to believe that these categories of personality or life story are just inaccurate cliches. ‘Single mother household boys’ are not all the same, although they may share some ‘traits’. Everyone has an individual life story with its own intricacies. Which is also why I think its bullshit to have DSM categorizations like ‘Narcissist’. As if every narcissist was exactly the same person with exactly the same emotional trauma. It dehumanizes people.

            I think the best way to go, even later, will be to tell my story and add a disclaimer: Take what you agree with, ditch the rest. Your life is unique.

          • Deanie Dean

            Yes i didn’t mean in the sense of cliches.

            I meant all these guys have been negatively influenced by single mother household though they each had a unique past experience.

            And it would be about tackling the overall issue ( single mother household ) so future generations wouldn’t have to have that negative experience. Making sense?

            Just like a lot of guys have been fucked over by feminism and although they all had unique experiences , it would be about tackling the issue of feminism ( the theme going around ROK i guess?)

          • I think you can’t handle a general issue like that. In my opinion, the change has to come from within individual people. When all people heal themselves, society will heal. Society can’t force healing top-down through policies. The best you could get would be the appearance of health.

            That said, I suppose its good to bring awareness about these things.

            To tackle it, it has to be understood. By the individual. And to be understood, it has to be individually felt as truth. That is why ‘truth’ only goes so far. ‘Truth’ is irrelevant if you don’t feel it and experience it.

            When I am healed myself, I plan to write a book called ‘Divine Masculinity’. And maybe something about that single mother and fatherless thing. Meanwhile, I’ll focus on my little articles here. :)